Capital Refinery
For private credit

The book is bigger. The covenant infrastructure is still spreadsheets.

See covenant pressure before the breach surfaces — covenant early warning with continuous borrower monitoring and evidence-backed breach forecasting.

Parse the credit agreement, bind covenants to live borrower data, and run breach probability and time-to-consequence on every position. The diagnostic the compliance certificate was never built to be.

The artifact — Falcon Services covenant forecast

This is what your morning brief looks like on a credit position.

Falcon Services is a live PE/PC services position under watch posture. Below: the IC memo with risk signals graded against firm policy. The covenant forecast workbook (downloadable) carries the same fingerprint and reads the same evidence — usable in the credit committee, forwardable to the LP.

Live artifact · public verification
Falcon Services — IC memo + covenant forecast
Lane: Private credit · Watch posture · Continuous covenant grading
Fingerprint
0d8c7d10b6309e8e
Embedded preview — the actual artifact your counterparty receives.
Verify this artifact ↗

This is the artifact the workout team reads in the morning brief, the credit committee reads at the quarterly, and the LP reads in the position-level pack. One record, one fingerprint, one evidence standard.

The credit workflow today

Five gaps direct lenders are operating around.

Bain estimates private credit AUM at $1.7 trillion and growing. The infrastructure for governing those positions is still spreadsheets and PDF compliance certificates — and, per the EY 2024 Private Capital Tech Survey, the dominant blocker is the absence of a unified data architecture, not model capability.

What the team believes it has
A covenant model that updates with each operator submission.A spreadsheet copy of the covenant table maintained by hand and three months out of date.
Breach probability on every position, re-run as borrower data lands.A quarterly compliance certificate that arrives after the breach has already happened.
Time-to-consequence ranking on every position.A status colour on a dashboard that does not know how much room is left.
Stress shocks that propagate live across the portfolio.An ad-hoc Excel rebuild every time the LP asks for an interest-rate scenario.
Lender consent rights surfaced as workflow, not legalese.A 200-page agreement nobody on the monitoring team has actually read since closing.

Bain & Company 2025 Global Private Equity Report; EY 2024 Private Capital Tech Survey

Portfolio-wide stress event
Per position, every time
Trigger
Rates move 50bps · Sector EBITDA shock · LP request
01
Pull credit agreement
Find the PDF in the deal folder
02
Rebuild covenant model
Re-spread financials in Excel
03
Re-run the shock
Apply rate or EBITDA delta by hand
04
Hand-format for IC
Write the memo, build the slide
Loop ↺
Repeat for the next position in the book. Then the next. Then the next.
A rate move or EBITDA shock forces the credit team to manually reconstruct the agreement context on every position in the book — sequentially.
MANUAL · 0% reuse
The operating loop for credit

Signal → Scenario → Intervention → Output.

The same four-stage loop, built for direct lending: covenant-aware signals, breach-aware scenarios, lender-aware workflows, and outputs that hold up under examination.

01

See pressure early

Know which positions are moving toward breach before the compliance certificate arrives.

Each covenant is bound to the operator data that tests it. Breach probability re-runs as new operator data lands. The book is ranked by proximity to break — not by last quarter's traffic-light colour.

02

Understand downside clearly

Run stress fast enough to answer the lender call, not prepare for it.

Shock scenarios propagate across the book. Time-to-consequence, breach probability, and fund-level concentration are visible in the same pass. PIK accrual, payment waterfall, and consent rights are first-class — not spreadsheet footnotes.

03

Act in a governed workflow

Turn a breach signal into a structured response, not an email chain.

When a position trips the wire, the platform surfaces lender consent requirements, assigns action owners, and tracks resolution. The team stays in control through the amendment process — not through a compliance meeting where everyone agrees to send another waiver request.

04

Defend the decision when the scrutiny comes later

The decision basis survives the LP review.

Every covenant breach, every waiver, every amendment decision is recorded with its reasoning and its alternatives. When the LP asks why the team chose to amend instead of accelerate, the answer is already structured — not a narrative someone has to rebuild.

The covenant figure, read off the certificate

Not a re-keyed dashboard — the certified ratio, with the headroom.

Every credit officer has been burned by a covenant table that’s a quarter stale, or by a sponsor’s forecast column standing in for the certified actual. Capital Refinery reads the total net leverage and fixed-charge-coverage ratios — and the cap or floor each is measured against — straight from the borrower’s compliance certificate, and shows the headroom that remains: leverage 3.22x against a 5.00x cap (1.78x of room), FCCR 1.38x against a 1.15x floor (0.23x of room). A forecast column cannot impersonate the certified actual, and a covenant whose actual can’t be sourced is shown blank rather than invented.

And the number is defensible all the way down: every figure the platform serves is traceable to a source document, recorded as a contradiction, or absent — never fabricated — enforced by a release gate that can’t pass by dropping a failing check. The figure you put in front of your IC, your LP, or a regulator is one you can source.

From certificate line to covenant position
Illustrative example · FreshSpan Grocery Distribution (demo deal)

The reported actual — read off the certificate, not re-keyed.

The covenant ratio and its threshold are lifted directly from the borrower’s compliance certificate — the reported actuals for the period, never a re-keyed figure or a forecast column — and the headroom that remains is computed against the contractual threshold the lender signed.

FreshSpan Grocery Distribution, LLC
Compliance Certificate · Credit Agreement §8.02(b)
Measurement period: fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2026
§7.01(a) — Maximum Total Net Leverage Ratio
Consolidated Funded Debt
$186.4M
less: Unrestricted Cash
($14.9M)
Consolidated Net Debt
$171.5M
Consolidated EBITDA (LTM)
$48.6M
Total Net Leverage Ratio
3.53x
Covenant — not to exceed
4.25x
Compliance
In Compliance
§7.01(b) — Minimum Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio
Consolidated EBITDA (LTM)
$48.6M
less: Unfinanced Capex
($6.2M)
less: Cash Taxes
($5.1M)
Numerator (adjusted)
$37.3M
Scheduled Debt Service (P+I)
$21.0M
Cash Interest
$9.4M
Fixed Charges
$30.4M
Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio
1.23x
Covenant — not less than
1.10x
Compliance
In Compliance

Forecast / projection columns on the source certificate are excluded — reported actuals for the measurement period only.

→ Read directly from the certificate — not re-keyed, not modeled
Total net leveragecap 4.25x
3.53x
0.72x of headroom · ~17% below cap
§7.01(a) · Q1 FY2026 · Net Debt $171.5M ÷ EBITDA $48.6M
Fixed charge coveragefloor 1.10x
1.23x
0.13x above floor · ~12% cushion — the binding constraint
§7.01(b) · Q1 FY2026 · Adj. EBITDA $37.3M ÷ Fixed Charges $30.4M

Bring us a credit agreement.

We'll parse it into a structured capital structure record and run breach probability against the live operator data. Real document. Real position. Returned the same day.