Capital Refinery
For private equity

You approved one story. The company is now living another.

See the thesis break before the valuation does — the IC thesis kept alive across the entire hold.

Capital Refinery anchors the IC thesis at approval, tests drift against the entry assumptions on every data refresh, and surfaces when the thesis stops holding — before the exposure compounds into a quarterly LP problem.

Decision validity window
Position #4127
T0T+12mT+18m
IC approves
Thesis live, conditions held
Conditions shift
Two assumptions invalidated
No longer defensible
Time to consequence: 90d
Capital Refinery surfaces the moment your prior IC decision stops being correct — and how long the team has been operating in the gap.
DRIFT · 142d
The artifact — Falcon Services IC memo

This is what your IC anchor looks like, and what drift looks like against it.

Falcon Services is a public-tenant PE/PC services deal under continuous watch posture. The IC memo below is the live artifact — IC anchor at approval, drift since IC, risk signals graded against firm policy, and the decision record. Every evidence fingerprint is independently verifiable.

Live artifact · public verification
Falcon Services — IC memo
Lane: Private credit / PE services · Continuous drift since IC anchor
Fingerprint
0d8c7d10b6309e8e
Embedded preview — the actual artifact your counterparty receives.
Verify this artifact ↗

This is the artifact your team sees in the morning brief, your LP sees in the quarterly pack, and your IC sees on the next-action queue. One record, one fingerprint, one source of truth across the hold period.

The PE workflow today

Five gaps every PE team is operating around.

Bain estimates $3.6 trillion of unrealized value sits on GP balance sheets, with hold periods extending into a sixth and seventh year. None of the gaps below are the team's fault — they are the structural shape of a stack that was built to collect data, not to govern decisions across that kind of timeline.

What the team believes it has
An IC memo the team can revisit when conditions change.An aging slide deck on a shared drive that no one re-opens after Q+1.
A monitoring dashboard that flags when the entry thesis stops holding.Today's KPIs with no link back to the entry assumptions or the thesis they invalidate.
An accounting feed that powers a continuous reconciliation against thesis.A quarterly reconstruction exercise rebuilt in Excel from the operator's PDF.
An exit-ready model that always reflects current conditions.A static model that gets dusted off two weeks before the GP-led process kicks off.
A clean handoff from deal team to operating team.Institutional memory living in the head of one principal who is now staffed on a new transaction.

Bain & Company, 2025 Global Private Equity Report

The operating loop for PE

Anchor → Drift → Decision → Defense.

The IC thesis is anchored at approval. Drift against the entry assumptions is tracked continuously. Decisions are made in a governed workflow, not an email thread. The defense survives the room changing — and the principal moving on.

01

Anchor the thesis at IC

The decision basis is captured to a tamper-evident record at approval.

Entry KPIs, assumptions, and thresholds are bound to the IC record at the moment of commit. The anchor does not depend on the principal remembering what was said in the room or the deck living in someone's Downloads folder.

02

Track drift continuously

When the company starts living a different story, the system says so.

Live operator data is reconciled against entry assumptions in every refresh. Drift surfaces by axis — financial consistency, customer concentration, key-person dependency, governance, management responsiveness — not as a single 'health' color.

03

Decide in a governed workflow

Pressure becomes assigned action, not another quarterly debate.

War Room narrows the view to the decisions that matter. Each option has an explicit consequence. Owners assigned, deadlines set, locked decisions reduce the queue. The team stays in control through forced resolution.

04

Defend the decision later

When the LP asks why the hold extended, the answer is already structured.

IC memo, board deck, evidence trail, outcome record — produced from the same data the team operated on. The defense survives partner turnover, fund-level review, and the GP-led process.

Drift since IC
Illustration · Red River Engineered Components (demo deal) · as of Q2 FY26

You approved one story. Here’s where it stopped holding.

Every position is re-tested against the assumptions it was approved on — not a generic threshold. When the thesis stops holding, it surfaces by axis, with a date, before it becomes a quarterly LP surprise.

Customer concentration
IC: ≤ 30% of revenue
30%31%34%38%breach42%
⚠ Breachentry case broken · Q3 FY26
Gross margin
IC: 34.0%
34.0%33.6%33.1%32.4%31.9%
▽ Drifting−210 bps vs entry
Net leverage
IC: 4.1x
4.1x4.1x4.0x4.0x3.9x
✓ Holdinginside entry case
FCCR headroom
IC: 1.40x · floor 1.15x
1.40x1.38x1.35x1.31x1.27x
✓ Holdingnarrowing, above floor

The break is defined as crossing the entry assumption — what was approved at IC — not a covenant or a generic target. Leverage and FCCR are holding inside the entry case; the thesis broke on the quality of the revenue, the assumption the deal was underwritten on, while the covenants the lender watches still look fine.

Why the numbers in that memo hold

No figure reaches an IC memo unless it can prove where it came from.

Drift only matters if the numbers you’re drifting from are real. Every figure Capital Refinery serves is one of three things: traceable to a source document, recorded as a contradiction between sources, or honestly absent — never a stale placeholder, never a model’s guess. Internally contradictory financials are refused at the write boundary — a leverage ratio that doesn’t equal its components, a coverage ratio that’s mathematically impossible, an equity or cash cell mislabeled as debt — so the impossible number never reaches the memo in the first place.

That standard runs as a release gate across the whole portfolio before anything ships — and the gate cannot pass by quietly dropping a failing check. It is the difference between an AI tool you have to double-check and a record you can sign under.

Release gate · last run
Passed
  • ✓ All proof packs TRUTH_CLEAN
  • ✓ 0 active KPI defects — across the entire deal population, not a demo set
  • ✓ Negative controls reproducing · 0 lost

The release does not ship until every served figure proves itself — and the gate cannot go green by dropping a failing check.

The Why-this-number overlay on a Capital Refinery IC memo — clicking the EBITDA figure shows its extraction method (deterministic parser), confidence (65%), candidates evaluated (357), derivation, and an audit ID
Per number, not just per system: click any figure in the memo and see its extraction method, confidence, how many candidates were evaluated, the derivation, and an audit ID — the reasoning behind the number, not a filename.

Bring us a deal you actually hold.

We'll anchor the entry thesis, surface drift since IC, and walk you through the decision-defense layer on your own diligence pack. Same day. No demo data.